Friday, March 7, 2014

GIS I Lab 1: Base Data

Introduction:

The goal of this lab was to become familiar with the different data within the United States Census Bureau. The state of Wisconsin was the selected area of study for this assignment. The total population of Wisconsin was the assigned map. The assignment called for another map to be made based on my own interests, and the data from the two maps were then to be analyzed for different spatial patterns and trends.

Methods:

The first step in being able to complete this assignment was to become comfortable using the data provided by the United States Census Bureau. Once at the site, the data dealing with total population was needed. By clicking on the topics tab on the left hand side of the page, this allowed for different categories of data to be displayed. When the topics were displayed, the category “people” was selected, followed by “basic count/estimate”. By choosing these categories, it allowed for accessing the necessary data dealing with the total population for the state of Wisconsin.

Once the data was located, it was necessary to choose the SF1 set of data. The reason for this is the assignment called for the basic census data. It did not require ACS, or American Community Survey data. After the SF1 data for total population was selected, it needed to be downloaded to the folder dealing with the data pertaining to this particular assignment.
When the data was downloaded to the desired location, it then needed to be unzipped so the data was easier to access. After being unzipped, the different comma separated values, CSV, files needed to be identified to see which file contained the metadata and the actual tabular data. Once the actual tabular data was located, that file was then saved into a MS excel file. Since this information only contained the different tabular data, it was necessary to go back to the United States Census website to download the information containing the spatial representations for the different Wisconsin counties.

The next task was to download the shapefile for the Wisconsin census data. By going back to the United States Census website, they had the information we needed. The first step was to click on the geographies tab on the left hand side of the screen. Instead of keeping the window on the list tab, the map tab needed to be selected. Once the selection was made, it showed the selected area of all the counties for the state of Wisconsin. After all the needed data was selected, it needed to be downloaded. By clicking on the download icon, it brought up a window with different options as to how the data would be stored. For the purpose of the assignment, the shapefiles selection was the necessary output of our data. The data was then downloaded to the desired location and unzipped, like was done with the previous data that was downloaded.

After all the data was downloaded and organized, ArcMap was needed to show the different data that was acquired. The shapefile for the Wisconsin counties was the first thing added to the map. After the shapefile, the table dealing with the total population was then added to the map. Since these two data sets had separate attribute tables, it was necessary to join the two tables by a common attribute. The common attribute in this case was GEO#id, so that is how the tables were linked together. Once they were linked, the data could then be viewed as one table, rather than two separated tables.

As of now, all the data has been added to the table, but it does not show any thing because of how it is currently mapped.  It was necessary to change the properties for the shapefile to make an understandable map. The assignment called for a graduated colors map to be made so the population distribution throughout Wisconsin could be easily recognized. Since there was only one variable to map, it was not necessary to normalize this data set.

The last task for the assignment was to create another map for a data set of my choosing. That data set I chose pertained to the occupancy percentage of houses, and that was divided into owner occupancy or renter occupancy.  

As outlined above, the first step was to go to the United States Census website to access the information. SF1 data was then selected again in order to have all the necessary information for the different counties. I chose a data set that looked interesting and fulfilled all the necessary expectations. Once the data was chosen, it was then downloaded to the desired location and unzipped into that folder. Since this was going to a new map, the first thing I did was create a new data frame in ArcMap to keep the data separated from the first map. Then the tabular data then needed to be saved into an MS excel file. Once it was converted into an MS excel file, it could then be added to the new data from in ArcMap. Since the shapefile for the Wisconsin counties was already made, it was not necessary to repeat that step again, rather just add it to the map with the household occupancy data.

Once both data sets were added to the map, the attribute tables then needed to be joined based on a common attribute. Once again, the common attribute was GEO#id. Once the tables were joined, a variable needed to be chosen in order to map the data. The data I chose to map showed the owner occupancy of households for the state of Wisconsin. Since there were three different variables to choose from, it was necessary to look back at the metadata table to see what variable was being mapped.

After both maps were made, the data frames needed to be changed to be more local over the state of Wisconsin. It was not necessary to use the project tool in this case; all that was needed was to change the projection for each individual data frame. 

Results:

Figure 2.1 These are the two maps of population. The map on the left shows the number of housing units occupied by the owner. The map on the right shows the total population of each county in Wisconsin.

The graphic above shows the two different maps made of the state of Wisconsin. The pattern between a higher population and higher amount of home owner occupancy are almost directly related. The counties that have a larger population typically also have a higher amount of homeowners that occupy their own home.

Sources:

 United States Census Bureau. (2014, March 6). Retrieved http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

GIS I Lab 1: Base Data

Goal and Background:

The purpose of this assignment was to show the different features surrounding the area of the confluence project. The confluence project is a county wide project that will provide student housing and create a new art center in downtown Eau Claire. It is intended to break ground in 2014. The goal of this assignment was to show the location of different features of the city that surround the confluence project.
Methods:

The first thing that had to be done was to create a geodatabase for the proposed site of the confluence project.  Once the geodatabase was made, a feature class for the proposed site needed to be added. This allowed that specific feature class to be applied easily to all the maps. Once the feature class was made, we had to digitize the site so it was easier to identify. After the site had been digitized, new individual maps had to be made to highlight different features around the area of the confluence project.

The first map made dealt with the PLSS or public land survey system. A new data frame was created in order to keep all related information together. A basemap of the world was added in order to locate the proposed site and see the surrounding area. The PLSS section feature class was added to the map from both the county and city data. Once that was added, the PLSS quarter quarter sections were added to the map from the county and city data. This allowed for a more specific area of where the proposed site was located.

 Once the site was identified, the next step was to build a very brief legal description for each of the two parcels. Once the legal description was made, the next step was to build multiple relevant maps of the area surrounding the confluence project.

The first map was dealing with civil divisions. The first step was inserting a new data frame to keep all the information together. Then the civil divisions feature class was added to the map along with the proposed site feature class. This showed what civil division the confluence project was located in. The next map showed where the different census boundaries were located. A new data frame was inserted for this data. The block and tract groups feature class was then added to the map. The tracts had to be moved on top of the block group in order to see the both of them. The block group was then set to represent the population of 2007 for the City of Eau Claire. The next data frame needed was with the data for the City of Eau Claire. Once the new data frame was made, the parcel area, centerlines and water feature classes were added to the map. An aerial map was added in order to more easily identify the different parcel areas.

The next map that was made was for the different zoning classes. A data frame was made for Zoning and the zoning areas feature class was then added to the map. Due to the large amounts of different zone classes, the assignment called for the classes to be grouped based on similar symbols. Since the data was narrowed down, it made the map much easier to understand for the viewer.

The last map dealt with the different voting districts for the City of Eau Claire. A new data frame was inserted, and the voting district feature class was added to the map. The districts were labeled so it would be known what zone the confluence project would be located in.

Results:

Figure 1.1 This is a compilation of all the base maps for the area surrounding the Confluence Project.
 
There is no significant pattern with all these different maps. There is something interesting that is happening in the same block group as the confluence project. The zoning map shows that it is mainly central district zoning where the confluence project is located. Even though it is not strictly residential, there is still a fairly large population living in that particular block group.
 
Sources:
W:\geog\CHupy\geog335_s14\lab\lab1: 2009-07-13_EauClaire.gdb and City of Eau Claire.gdb
 
Property search. (2014, 2 17). Retrieved from http://www.bis-net.net/cityofeauclaire/search.cfm